Participating Funding Agencies

Participating PolarCLIMATE Funding Agencies

Funding Organisation

Country

Initial Amount Available**

Fonds Zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung  (FWF)

Austria

200 000

Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO)

Belgium

200 000 €  and in-kind infrastructure support

Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)

Belgium

200 000 €   over 4 years and in-kind infrastructure support

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO)

Belgium

200 000 € 

Bulgarian Antarctic Institute (BAI)

Bulgaria

In-kind infrastructure support

Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy České republiky (MSMT)

Czech Republic

250 686 €  over 3 years (2009-2011) 

Forsknings- og Innovationsstyrelsen (DASTI) 1

Denmark

In-kind logistical support

(1 Support in Cooperation with The Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland)

Eesti Teadusfondi koduleheküljele (ETF)

Estonia

200 000 € 

Liikenne- Ja Viestintäministeriö (MiTOC)

Finland

200 000 € 

L'Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV)

France

400 000 and 3 000 000 in-kind logistical support   

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)

Germany

2 000 000 €  in the period 2009-2012 and in-kind infrastructure support

Programma Nazionale di Ricerche in Antartide  (PNRA)

Italy

300 000 €  and in-kind logistical and infrastructure support

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)

The Netherlands

200 000 €  in the period 2009-2012

Norges forskningsråd (RCN)

Norway

400 000 €  over 3 year period

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju National (NCBiR)

Poland

150 000 € 

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)

Portugal

200 000 € 

Ministry of Education, Research and Youth

Romania

500 000 €  TBC

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN)

Spain

300 000 € 

Vetenskapsrådet (VR)

Sweden

200 000 € 

Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

United Kingdom

In-kind logistical and infrastructure support

**Dependent upon evaluation of scientific proposals

 

Description of Funding Method: Virtual Common Pot

The funding in the PolarCLIMATE call was national.  There was complete control by the agencies over national funds. PolarCLIMATE aimed at funding the highest ranked proposals. The initial available budget per country was explicitly stated in the Call for Proposals. It provided realistic expectations to the applicants on the maximum number of projects to be funded in each country. An agency did not have to spend all the money that had been provisionally reserved, e.g. when there were no (more) projects of excellent scientific quality for that country. Some agencies were able generate extra money to fund good proposals.

Cooperation with Scientists and agencies from Outside of Europe

The PolarCLIMATE programme encouraged the establishment of partnerships with scientists and programmes outside of Europe (Eg; United States, Canada, China, India, Australia etc.) as Associated Partners. A number of External European Polar funding Agency managers were invited to liaise with the PolarCLIMATE Programme Board to enable the assessment of feasibility of international partnerships and the potential for funding and access to non-European polar research stations and polar logistics.